CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Trump administration legal theories underpinning birthright citizenship case would be ‘disastrous’ for US says legal expert  

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

CERL is hiring a director of litigation and policy — apply today!

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Post-doctoral fellow

Justice scales with gavel and stack of books on wooden table

United States military actions against Venezuela: Will international criminal law be enforced? An explainer

The Supreme Court has begun to hear oral arguments for a landmark case that will determine the future of birthright citizenship in the United States. In an appearance on MS NOW, CERL Affiliated Faculty Member Kermit Roosevelt talks about the history of birthright citizenship, the likelihood of the Supreme Court overturning birthright citizenship, and his concerns about other legal challenges and theories the Trump administration has put forth that may jeopardize the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments. 

Kermit Roosevelt is the David Berger Professor for the Administration of Justice and a member of CERL’s Affiliated Faculty at the University of Pennsylvania. Read his bio here

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university. 

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Trump administration legal theories underpinning birthright citizenship case would be ‘disastrous’ for US says legal expert   on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Trump administration legal theories underpinning birthright citizenship case would be ‘disastrous’ for US says legal expert