CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

SCOTUS rejection of “independent state legislature” theory

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Postdoctoral Fellow

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Postdoctoral Litigation and Policy Fellowship

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Apply today: Director of Litigation and Policy

Justice scales with gavel and stack of books on wooden table

United States military actions against Venezuela: Will international criminal law be enforced? An explainer

In a 6-to-3 majority, the Supreme Court rejected a legal theory that would give state legislatures largely unrestricted power over federal elections. CERL Executive Board Member Stuart Gerson discusses this ruling and others in a blog post for Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

Stuart Gerson is Member of the Firm at Epstein Becker Green, former Acting Attorney General of the United States, and Founding Member of Checks & Balances. Read his bio here.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share SCOTUS rejection of “independent state legislature” theory on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
SCOTUS rejection of “independent state legislature” theory