CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Revoking security clearances of 37 U.S. officials was ‘unlawful and unconstitutional’

Over 30 national security officials this week had their security clearances revoked by President Trump. Mark Zaid, member of CERL’s Executive Board, is quoted in a New York Times article discussing this latest move by the administration to rid intelligence of “politicization,” noting that the decision to strip officials of their clearances was “unlawful and unconstitutional.”

Zaid is also quoted at Axios (here), Newsweek (here), and TIME (here).

Mark S. Zaid, Esq., is a Washington, D.C. based attorney who specializes in crisis management and innovatively handling simple and complex administrative and litigation matters primarily relating to national security, international law, foreign sovereign and diplomatic immunity, and the Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts. He is a member of CERL’s Executive Board. Read his bio here

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Revoking security clearances of 37 U.S. officials was ‘unlawful and unconstitutional’ on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Revoking security clearances of 37 U.S. officials was ‘unlawful and unconstitutional’