CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Proof of taking the oath of office is not a constitutional requirement

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Post-doctoral fellow

A summer day in front of the US Supreme Court Building in Washington, DC.

Teetering on the edge: The Trump administration’s congressional allies push forward the attack on the federal judiciary

2025SummerInternship_0259

Call for applications: CERL’s 2026 Summer Internship Program

CERL logo

CERL files FOIA request seeking release of secret OLC memo said to legally justify capture of Venezuelan president

AR 24-25 Cover

Read CERL’s 2024-2025 Annual Report

A video circulating on social media incorrectly claims that officials in the Biden administration have not taken their oaths of office and therefore are serving illegitimately. APPC’s FactCheck.org explains why the video’s claims, and a petition on which they are based, are false, citing commentary from CERL Affiliated Faculty Kermit Roosevelt.

Kermit Roosevelt works in a diverse range of fields, focusing on constitutional law and conflict of laws. He has published scholarly books in both fields. Conflict of Laws (Foundation Press, 2010) offers an accessible analytical overview of conflicts. The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions (Yale, 2006) sets out standards by which citizens can determine whether the Supreme Court is abusing its authority to interpret the Constitution. Read his bio here.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Proof of taking the oath of office is not a constitutional requirement on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Proof of taking the oath of office is not a constitutional requirement