CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

New York Times op-ed: “Lawyers Told Gina Haspel Torture Was Legal. But It Never Was.”

Share this Post

Related posts

Microphones prepared for the press conference and mic flags displaying fake news logos: disinformation and propaganda concept, blank copy space

How the Trump administration is weaponizing the Communications Act of 1934

This May 9 op-ed was written by CERL Director Claire Finkelstein and CERL board member Dr. Stephen Xenakis, who assert that Haspel’s adherence to orders and legal advice does not absolve her from her involvement in torture and in the destruction of video evidence.

Mailing List

Submissions

A blog covering ethics and rule of law issues in national security, warfare, and democratic governance. The opinions expressed in these posts are those of the writers and do not necessarily represent CERL’s official views.

Please submit to the Rule of Law Post via this form. For additional details on the blog post format, refer to CERL’s submission guidelines. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you kindly complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share New York Times op-ed: “Lawyers Told Gina Haspel Torture Was Legal. But It Never Was.” on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
New York Times op-ed: “Lawyers Told Gina Haspel Torture Was Legal. But It Never Was.”