CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​
Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin Youtube
Give Now

New legal brief argues against removing Meadows’ case to federal court

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Postdoctoral Fellow

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Postdoctoral Litigation and Policy Fellowship

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Apply today: Director of Litigation and Policy

CERL files amicus brief emphasizing Senator Mark Kelly’s statement in “Don’t Give Up the Ship” video is an accurate reflection of the law of superior orders

Justice scales with gavel and stack of books on wooden table

United States military actions against Venezuela: Will international criminal law be enforced? An explainer

A group of Republicans on Monday filed an amicus brief arguing that removing Mark Meadows’ Georgia election case to federal court would be inappropriate, citing the constitutionally entrusted role of states to administer federal elections. CERL Executive Board member Stuart Gerson is among the signatories.

Stuart Gerson is Member of the Firm at Epstein Becker Green, former Acting Attorney General of the United States, and Founding Member of Checks & Balances. He is also a member of the CERL Executive Board. Read his bio here.

Read Here

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share New legal brief argues against removing Meadows’ case to federal court on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
New legal brief argues against removing Meadows’ case to federal court