CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

New legal brief argues against removing Meadows’ case to federal court

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

CERL is hiring a director of litigation and policy — apply today!

2025SummerInternship_0259

Call for applications: CERL’s 2026 Summer Internship Program

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Post-doctoral fellow

Penn CERL and NIMJ file amicus brief in United States v. Askins urging Court to apply international law lens to “at war” tolling provision 

Military legal proceedings

The Pentagon’s distortions of law to justify its Venezuela operations have a name—“Lawfare”

Robert Fuller, Jr.

CERL mourns the death of Captain Robert G. Fuller Jr., Esq., a longtime friend and benefactor to the Center  

A group of Republicans on Monday filed an amicus brief arguing that removing Mark Meadows’ Georgia election case to federal court would be inappropriate, citing the constitutionally entrusted role of states to administer federal elections. CERL Executive Board member Stuart Gerson is among the signatories.

Stuart Gerson is Member of the Firm at Epstein Becker Green, former Acting Attorney General of the United States, and Founding Member of Checks & Balances. He is also a member of the CERL Executive Board. Read his bio here.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share New legal brief argues against removing Meadows’ case to federal court on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
New legal brief argues against removing Meadows’ case to federal court