CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Jonas breaks down why the AUKUS deal was inevitable

For the Washington Times, CERL Advisory Council member David S. Jonas weighs in on the inevitability of the Australia-United Kingdom-United States alliance (AUKUS), and Australia’s recent decision to acquire nuclear submarines from the U.S. and the U.K. after canceling a significant contract with France.

Jonas, with co-author Patrick Rhoads, note that an initially surprising decision proves unavoidable when considering China’s retaliatory “campaign of economic coercion” and “famed ‘wolf warrior’ tactics” against Australia.

“In retrospect, the only answer for the Aussies was the acquisition of nuclear submarines, which enabled long-duration deployments with the necessary stealth to counter the Chinese navy,” said Jonas and Rhoads. “Some Australian Ministry of Defence members have lobbied for nuclear submarines since the 1990s.”

David S. Jonas is a Partner at Fluet, as well as an adjunct professor at Georgetown University Law Center and George Washington University Law School. Read his bio here

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university. 

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Jonas breaks down why the AUKUS deal was inevitable on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Jonas breaks down why the AUKUS deal was inevitable