CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​
George Croner

Future use of Insurrection Act in the hands of the courts

Share this Post

Related posts

In the Supreme Court case Trump v. Illinois, the Court ruled that in order to federalize the National Guard under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3), the president would need to demonstrate that he is unable to execute federal law with regular U.S. military forces. However, the majority also made clear that § 12406 is not excluded from the Posse Comitatus Act, which states that the military cannot be used to execute federal laws. With this avenue closed to him, President Trump may turn to the Insurrection Act to activate National Guard or even regular active-duty troops to enforce his agenda. CERL Advisory Council Member George Croner discusses how the Supreme Court will likely have to weigh in on this matter.

George W. Croner was the principal litigation counsel in the Office of General Counsel at the National Security Agency (NSA). He is a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI) in its national security program and a member of CERL’s Advisory Council. Read his full bio here. 

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Future use of Insurrection Act in the hands of the courts on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Future use of Insurrection Act in the hands of the courts