CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Examining public sentiment in cultural heritage sites

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Post-doctoral fellow

A summer day in front of the US Supreme Court Building in Washington, DC.

Teetering on the edge: The Trump administration’s congressional allies push forward the attack on the federal judiciary

2025SummerInternship_0259

Call for applications: CERL’s 2026 Summer Internship Program

CERL logo

CERL files FOIA request seeking release of secret OLC memo said to legally justify capture of Venezuelan president

AR 24-25 Cover

Read CERL’s 2024-2025 Annual Report

As part of a Penn Global Engagement Fund project grant, conducted in collaboration with Vit Henisz of the Wharton School, CERL Affiliated Faculty Lynn Meskell examined public sentiment in every UNESCO World Heritage site inscribed since 1990. What she found is that popular notions of these sites are often at odds with how international organizations such as UNESCO and NATO represent them.

Prof. Meskell delivered her findings to NATO in Brussels this February and will present her research this summer in Rome and Sydney.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Examining public sentiment in cultural heritage sites on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Examining public sentiment in cultural heritage sites