CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

California’s lawsuit challenging President Trump’s federalization of the National Guard is ‘quite strong’

CERL’s Professor Claire Finkelstein participated in a virtual conversation hosted by the Center for A New American Strategy (CNAS) on the legal questions arising from President Donald Trump’s deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles, California, in response to ongoing protests against ICE raids. She argued, among other things, that Governor Gavin Newsom’s case is “quite strong,” noting that the authority under which President Trump federalized the National Guard, 10 U.S.C. § 12406, requires that there be a “rebellion.” 

The event also featured Carrie Cordero, CNAS Senior Fellow, and Professor Mark Nevitt, professor at Emory University School of Law.  

Claire Finkelstein is the Algernon Biddle Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy and Faculty Director of the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law. Read her bio here.    

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university.   

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share California’s lawsuit challenging President Trump’s federalization of the National Guard is ‘quite strong’ on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
California’s lawsuit challenging President Trump’s federalization of the National Guard is ‘quite strong’