CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Brief filed by Martin Lederman likely prompted Court to ask for more information in Trump v Illinois 

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

CERL is hiring a director of litigation and policy — apply today!

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Post-doctoral fellow

Justice scales with gavel and stack of books on wooden table

United States military actions against Venezuela: Will international criminal law be enforced? An explainer

On Wednesday, October 29, the Supreme Court asked for an additional briefing as they considered President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to Chicago. The request for additional information is probably a direct response to a brief filed by Professor Martin Lederman, a member of CERL’s Advisory Council, according to an article in The Seattle Medium. Professor Lederman argues that the law President Trump is using to deploy the National Guard to Chicago does not apply to civilian law enforcement, but only to support the activity of regular military forces. 

Martin Lederman is a Professor from Practice at Georgetown University Law Center. Read his bio here.  

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university.    

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Brief filed by Martin Lederman likely prompted Court to ask for more information in Trump v Illinois  on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Brief filed by Martin Lederman likely prompted Court to ask for more information in Trump v Illinois