CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Attacks on energy infrastructure should take risk of civilian casualties into account  

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

CERL is hiring a director of litigation and policy — apply today!

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Post-doctoral fellow

Justice scales with gavel and stack of books on wooden table

United States military actions against Venezuela: Will international criminal law be enforced? An explainer

As tension over the Strait of Hormuz escalates, President Trump has issued several threats directed towards energy infrastructure and bridges. These threats have triggered concern among international law experts. CERL Advisory Council Member Mary Ellen O’Connell warns that even if energy infrastructure is being used to transport military assets, it cannot be targeted if doing so means that civilians and/or their property are put at risk. 

Mary Ellen O’Connell is the Robert and Marion Short Professor of Law and Research Professor of International Dispute Resolution—Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame. Read her bio here.  

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university. 

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Attacks on energy infrastructure should take risk of civilian casualties into account   on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Attacks on energy infrastructure should take risk of civilian casualties into account