CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

New York Times op-ed: “Lawyers Told Gina Haspel Torture Was Legal. But It Never Was.”

Share this Post

Related posts

CERL logo

CERL, NIMJ, LDAD, and legal experts file amicus brief in support of Governor Newsom’s lawsuit against President Trump, citing grave rule of law concerns

CERL logo

CERL files amicus brief in Trump v. Illinois on behalf of more than 150 members of Congress in the Senate and House

Group of soldiers or spies in dark room with large monitors and advanced satellite communication technology launching a missle. Includes flashing yellow light.

“Acknowledged” covert activity and regime change plans for Venezuela?

This May 9 op-ed was written by CERL Director Claire Finkelstein and CERL board member Dr. Stephen Xenakis, who assert that Haspel’s adherence to orders and legal advice does not absolve her from her involvement in torture and in the destruction of video evidence.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share New York Times op-ed: “Lawyers Told Gina Haspel Torture Was Legal. But It Never Was.” on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
New York Times op-ed: “Lawyers Told Gina Haspel Torture Was Legal. But It Never Was.”