CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Appeals court decision a win for credibility and impartiality of U.S. Attorney’s offices

Share this Post

Related posts

Microphones prepared for the press conference and mic flags displaying fake news logos: disinformation and propaganda concept, blank copy space

How the Trump administration is weaponizing the Communications Act of 1934

On August 21, 2026, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld an earlier ruling that John Sarcone III’s appointment as Acting U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of New York was unlawful under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act. The Society for the Rule of Law, which had filed an amicus brief in the case, celebrated the outcome as an important bulwark against politicized and illegitimate prosecutions. Signatories of the friend-of-the-court brief included Stuart Gerson, Society for the Rule of Law Board Treasurer and a member of CERL’s Executive Board.

Stuart Gerson is Founding Member of Checks & Balances. He is also a member of the CERL Executive Board.

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Appeals court decision a win for credibility and impartiality of U.S. Attorney’s offices on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Appeals court decision a win for credibility and impartiality of U.S. Attorney’s offices