CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Experts discuss the implications of Nidal Hasan’s planned execution

Share this Post

Related posts

Microphones prepared for the press conference and mic flags displaying fake news logos: disinformation and propaganda concept, blank copy space

How the Trump administration is weaponizing the Communications Act of 1934

The proposed public military execution of Nidal Hasan continues to provoke controversy around its rationale and implementation. CERL Distinguished Senior Fellow Brenner Fissell, quoted by the Associated Press, notes that while execution by firing squad actually has the potential to be a clean, quick, and humane method, in this instance it was likely chosen as part of the Pentagon’s wider move towards a more “masculine” form of “lethality culture.” Professor Fissell also spoke with the Associated Press and Politico about the legal ramifications of streaming such an event, both for social media companies and for those––such as parents––who could potentially have both motivation and standing to stop it.

Brenner M. Fissell is professor of law (with tenure) at Villanova Law. He is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law. Read his bio here.

Read here and here.

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Experts discuss the implications of Nidal Hasan’s planned execution on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Experts discuss the implications of Nidal Hasan’s planned execution