CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Landmark Supreme Court decision met with criticism

Share this Post

Related posts

CERL summer interns complete research on topics ranging from regulating AI in warfare to election interference in the midterms

ClaireFinkelstein_0921_0009

CERL faculty director testifies before Congress in a spotlight forum on Blanche nomination 

In late June 2026, the Supreme Court decided the case Blanche v. Lau, which set new standards for some returning green card holders in the United States. On MS NOW, Affiliated Faculty Member Kermit Roosevelt draws parallels between what is happening today in the United States and the period immediately following reconstruction in the post-Civil War South.

Kermit Roosevelt is the David Berger Professor for the Administration of Justice and a member of CERL’s Affiliated Faculty at the University of Pennsylvania. Read his bio here.  

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Landmark Supreme Court decision met with criticism on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Landmark Supreme Court decision met with criticism