CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Legal options available to states for protecting autonomy of National Guard

Under agreements reached between the Trump administration and the National Guards of Texas and Florida, Guard personnel would be responsible for conducting law enforcement activities in support of efforts by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrest and detain undocumented immigrants. In commentary for a Center for a New American Security series, CERL’s Professor Claire Finkelstein explores the president’s legal avenues for exerting control over a state’s National Guard and the ways in which a state governor might resist.  

Claire Finkelstein is the Algernon Biddle Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy and Faculty Director of the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law. Read her bio here.   

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university.  

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Legal options available to states for protecting autonomy of National Guard on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Legal options available to states for protecting autonomy of National Guard