CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Why Secretary Austin reversed course in 9/11 case

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Postdoctoral Fellow

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Postdoctoral Litigation and Policy Fellowship

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Apply today: Director of Litigation and Policy

Justice scales with gavel and stack of books on wooden table

United States military actions against Venezuela: Will international criminal law be enforced? An explainer

In August, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin pulled out of plea agreements with three defendants on trial in the Sept. 11 case in Guantánamo. Brigadier General (ret.) John Baker, member of CERL’s Executive Board, spoke with Natalie Orpett of Lawfare in an episode of The Lawfare Podcast about the case and why the Secretary of Defense reversed course.

Brigadier General (ret.) John Baker, U.S. Marine Corps, leads the Federal Public Defender’s Office for the Western District of North Carolina. He served as the Chief Defense Counsel of the Guantánamo Military Commissions from 2015 through 2021.

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Why Secretary Austin reversed course in 9/11 case on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Why Secretary Austin reversed course in 9/11 case