CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Examining public sentiment in cultural heritage sites

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Post-doctoral fellow

CERL logo

CERL, NIMJ, LDAD, and legal experts file amicus brief in support of Governor Newsom’s lawsuit against President Trump, citing grave rule of law concerns

White House, Washington D.C.

The Trump administration’s bias is polluting the integrity of the intelligence community and damaging the nation’s security

CERL logo

CERL files amicus brief in Trump v. Illinois on behalf of more than 150 members of Congress in the Senate and House

Group of soldiers or spies in dark room with large monitors and advanced satellite communication technology launching a missle. Includes flashing yellow light.

“Acknowledged” covert activity and regime change plans for Venezuela?

As part of a Penn Global Engagement Fund project grant, conducted in collaboration with Vit Henisz of the Wharton School, CERL Affiliated Faculty Lynn Meskell examined public sentiment in every UNESCO World Heritage site inscribed since 1990. What she found is that popular notions of these sites are often at odds with how international organizations such as UNESCO and NATO represent them.

Prof. Meskell delivered her findings to NATO in Brussels this February and will present her research this summer in Rome and Sydney.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Examining public sentiment in cultural heritage sites on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Examining public sentiment in cultural heritage sites