CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

How the State Secrets Doctrine Undermines Democracy

Editor’s note: This mini-symposium on the Abu Zubaydah decision, rendered by the Supreme Court on March 3, 2022, raises important issues about the state secrets doctrine and transparency in democratic governance. The first two pieces are reprinted with permission from the original publishers. All posts are available here. This opinion was originally published on Bloomberg […]

State Secrets and the Blinding of Justice

Editor’s note: This mini-symposium on the Abu Zubaydah decision, rendered by the Supreme Court on March 3, 2022, raises important issues about the state secrets doctrine and transparency in democratic governance. The first two pieces are reprinted with permission from the original publishers. All posts are available here. This opinion was originally published on SpyTalk. […]

The Assange case shows that a “public interest” defense to unauthorized disclosures of classified information is neither wise nor workable

With British courts now having issued a formal order approving the extradition of Julian Assange, the debate sparked by Assange’s continuing legal saga will undoubtedly embrace the controversial question of whether Assange and others charged with unlawfully disclosing U.S. national security information should be afforded the opportunity to assert a “public interest” or “public accountability” […]

Putin’s terror state and the not so new world order

President Zelensky is right. Russia is a terrorist state. It has fully embraced terrorism as a national strategy. What is unfolding daily before the world’s eyes is hard to describe in any other terms. The recent, appalling report of mass-murder in Bucha and the murder of 52 civilians at the Kramatorsk train station are just […]

CERL Book Talk with Wojciech Sadurski

The Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law at Penn, together with the Department of Russian and East European Studies of Penn Arts and Sciences, hosted Wojciech Sadurski to discuss his book Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown. Prof. Sadurski is the Challis Professor of Jurisprudence at the University of Sydney. Moderating the talk was Claire Finkelstein, […]

Share Richard Painter says Justice Thomas should have recused from all cases before the Supreme Court involving the 2020 election on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Richard Painter says Justice Thomas should have recused from all cases before the Supreme Court involving the 2020 election