CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​
Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin Youtube
Give Now

Proceed with caution: Why curtailing Section 230 immunity is not the solution to social media regulation

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Post-doctoral fellow

A summer day in front of the US Supreme Court Building in Washington, DC.

Teetering on the edge: The Trump administration’s congressional allies push forward the attack on the federal judiciary

2025SummerInternship_0259

Call for applications: CERL’s 2026 Summer Internship Program

CERL logo

CERL files FOIA request seeking release of secret OLC memo said to legally justify capture of Venezuelan president

AR 24-25 Cover

Read CERL’s 2024-2025 Annual Report

Blog post author Ashley Fuchs asks how can the government require more accountability from Big Tech for its content without eroding the innovation and free expression CDA 230 brings about?

Read Here

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Center For Ethics and the Rule of Law

All Rights Reserved © 2026

Share Proceed with caution: Why curtailing Section 230 immunity is not the solution to social media regulation on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Proceed with caution: Why curtailing Section 230 immunity is not the solution to social media regulation