CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Delaying the sentencing of Trump in hush money case would “subvert the rule of law”

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Post-doctoral fellow

A summer day in front of the US Supreme Court Building in Washington, DC.

Teetering on the edge: The Trump administration’s congressional allies push forward the attack on the federal judiciary

2025SummerInternship_0259

Call for applications: CERL’s 2026 Summer Internship Program

CERL logo

CERL files FOIA request seeking release of secret OLC memo said to legally justify capture of Venezuelan president

AR 24-25 Cover

Read CERL’s 2024-2025 Annual Report

A group of amici curiae composed of 24 legal experts and public servants, including CERL Executive Board member Stuart Gerson, filed a brief in Donald J. Trump v. People of the State of New York arguing that to delay the sentencing of President-elect Donald Trump in his hush money case on the basis that he is set to assume the presidency would “subvert the rule of law.”

Stuart Gerson is Member of the Firm at Epstein Becker Green, former Acting Attorney General of the United States, and Founding Member of Checks & Balances. He is also a member of the CERL Executive Board. Read his bio here.

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Delaying the sentencing of Trump in hush money case would “subvert the rule of law” on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Delaying the sentencing of Trump in hush money case would “subvert the rule of law”