According to psychiatrist John Martin-Joy good faith comments about a public figure’s mental health should be respected, debated, and if necessary, disagreed with—but not condemned as grossly unethical
CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW
According to psychiatrist John Martin-Joy good faith comments about a public figure’s mental health should be respected, debated, and if necessary, disagreed with—but not condemned as grossly unethical
Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.
All Rights Reserved © 2025