Technological advances have improved current weapons systems and led to the development of more precise means and methods of warfare. But they have also created tools that can kill with an efficiency and in a manner previously unimaginable. Compounding the danger is the fact that advances in technology reduce traditional barriers to entry, increasing the likelihood these new weapons will fall into the hands of rogue actors. The new lethality of contemporary weaponry also puts civilians more directly in harm’s way, despite the increased precision and potential reduction in collateral damage presented by the new systems. Finally, the speed at which new weapons are being developed severely impacts the ability to create adequate defenses, and nations are impelled into increasingly offensive postures as they address their expanding national security concerns.
The need to develop a nuanced balance between advancing precision technologies and protecting against the impact of increasing lethality suggests the importance of increased consultation among military experts, the defense industry, and ethicists. While the public is aware of ethical debate surrounding the development of Autonomous Weapons Systems (AWIs), the popular opposition to so-called “killer robots” overlooks the increasing sophistication and ethical complexity of many other types of weapons systems where the same need to balance improvements in precision against exponential increases in lethality exists.
The purpose of this one-day public symposium is three-fold: 1) to examine rapidly advancing technologies in war and discuss legal and ethical dilemmas they raise for national security policy in an interdisciplinary conversation; 2) to help guide elected officials and other government policymakers in the development of military technology; and 3) to educate the general public on the implications of these technologies for democratic governance and their role in furthering national security.
The symposium will address four domains of new weaponry development: cybersecurity and artificial intelligence (AI); biological and chemical convergence; biological enhancements and genetics; and nanotechnology. Panels will consist of lawyers, ethicists, scientists, military and government service practitioners, technologists, and the private sector. Panelists will address the risks that new weaponry will used for malign purposes; the relative ease with which weaponry may be acquired, the adequacy of current regulatory measures, the need for new or better oversight, the relationship between military requirements and private sector innovation, and the need to identify and resolve important ethical and legal issues prior to full scale development and deployment of new weaponries.
The symposium concludes with a public keynote presentation by retired U.S. Army General Joseph L. Votel. During his service in the United States Army, General Votel held numerous command positions, to include serving as Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command and Commander of U.S. Central Command. Beginning in January 2020, General Votel will serve as chief executive officer of Business Executives for National Security (BENS), a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization of senior industry executives who apply best business practices to address the nation’s pressing security challenges.
This program has been approved for 5.0 ethics CLE credits for Pennsylvania lawyers. CLE credit may be available in other jurisdictions as well. Attendees seeking CLE credit should bring separate payment in the amount of $200.00 ($100.00 public interest/non-profit attorneys) cash or check made payable to The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania.
Location: University of Pennsylvania Law School, 3501 Sansom Street, Philadelphia PA
|9:00am – 9:30am||Registration – Haaga Lounge (The Goat)|
|9:30am – 9:35am||Welcome Remarks – Theodore Ruger, Dean and Bernard G. Segal Professor of Law – Gittis 1|
|9:35am – 10:45am||Panel 1: Cyber Security and Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Gittis 1|
Most technological advances in new weaponry depend on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. Although AI and its role in warfare have been increasingly in the spotlight, AI’s intersection with other technologies, particularly cyber technology, has been largely overlooked. Panel 1 will focus on the conjunction of AI and cyberwarfare and will address the type and level of disruption that AI-enabled cyber weapons may cause; the likelihood of anticipating and adequately defending against threats and attacks; accessibility of the technology to terrorists and other non-state actors; and the adequacy of current law and protocols to regulate the new technology and threats. Merging the two technologies raises novel legal and ethical issues. Should we rely solely on autonomous weapons systems to initiate defense measures? Or should we require a human actor in the decision loop? Is it possible for humans to understand the “thinking” being done by autonomous systems? Should AI systems be developed to enable human control, or would this needlessly inhibit the advancement of AI? Is it even possible to regulate a system that is continually evolving and that one day may be much more “intelligent” than humans?
Moderator:Professor Claire Finkelstein, CERL Founder & Faculty Director; Algernon Biddle Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy, University of PennsylvaniaPanelists: Professor Gary Brown, Professor of Cyber Law at the College of Information and Cyberspace, National Defense UniversityThe Honorable Thomas Ayres, General Counsel, United States Air ForceProfessor Derek Leben, Department Chair and Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh at JohnstownLTC Christopher Korpella, Associate Professor and Director of the Robotics Research Center at the United States Military Academy at West Point
|10:45am – 11:00am||Break|
|11:00am – 12:15pm||Panel 2: Biological and Chemical Convergence – Gittis 1|
Advances in technology are creating areas of convergence among traditional scientific disciplines, particularly in the domains of the biological and chemical sciences. As new methods are developed to weaponize biological and chemical agents, as this technology becomes more accessible to non-state actors, and as the technology’s products become increasing lethal, current regulatory mechanisms are struggling to keep pace. For example, scientists have developed processes to synthesize biological toxins by chemical means and, conversely, to make chemical warfare agents with the aid of bacterial enzymes. Are these chemically modified biological agents covered by the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Biological Weapons Convention, both, or neither? What potential does this technology hold for developing new weapons? Are there weaknesses in current governance mechanisms? Do rogue and non-state actors have access to this technology and the weapons it may spawn? Is it permissible to produce them if done for the purpose of designing antidotes and countermeasures? Is the first use of these weapons in a conflict ever justifiable? Does it matter whether the adversary was first to deploy them? Is it ethical to use these weapons in self-defense?
Moderator: Professor Victoria Sutton, Paul Whitfield Horn Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Biodefense, Law and Public Policy,Texas Tech School of Law
Professor Michael Horowitz, Professor of Political Science and the Associate Director of Perry World House at the University of Pennsylvania
Dr. Jesse Kirkpatrick, Research Assistant Professor, the Assistant Director of the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at George Mason University
Professor Gigi Kwik Gronvall, Associate Professor in the Department of Environmental Health and Engineering at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
|12:15pm – 1:30pm||Lunch – Attendees are free to have lunch on their own at one of the many nearby restaurants.|
|1:30pm – 2:45pm||Panel 3: Biological Enhancements and Genetics – Fitts Auditorium|
Less than 10 years ago, the idea of artificially enhancing human biology was thought the stuff of science fiction. Today, through technological advancements in areas such as Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) genetic research, science fiction becomes reality. One emerging area of development is the enhancement of human soldiers through biological and genetic intervention. These enhancements may take the form of augmented cognition, increased ability to operate while sleep deprived, magnified strength and stamina, quicker and more lasting recovery from physical and mental wounds, and heightened protection from certain chemical and biological agents. Panel 3 will discuss the state of current and future enhancements and the immense ethical implications that are involved. Is it ethical to alter the human condition to improve offensive or defensive military capability? Should we permit such enhancements to be passed along to future generations if the technology allows? Should individual servicemembers have the right to know the risks of these enhancements, and the right to refuse them? Given the level of expense and sophistication, is it likely this technology could fall into the hands of rogue actors?
Moderator: Christopher W. Jacobs, Fellow, Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School
Professor Jonathan Moreno,Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, of History and Sociology of Science, and of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania
Professor Victoria Sutton, Paul Whitfield Horn Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Biodefense, Law and Public Policy,Texas Tech School of Law
Dr. Edward Barrett, Director of Research, U.S. Naval Academy’s Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership
Dr. William Casebeer, Director of the Innovation Laboratory at Beyond Conflict
|2:45pm – 3:00pm||Break|
|3:00pm – 4:15pm||Panel 4: Nanotechnology – Fitts Auditorium|
The ability to make objects lighter, stronger, more compact, and less costly holds great appeal for the development of new weapons. Given the critical nature of data-driven technologies in warfare, the greatest advances in new weaponry are likely to come about by improvements in our ability to store increasing amounts of data on smaller and smaller substrata. The current tidal wave of technological advancement has shown unimaginable advances in data storage, and new weaponry has begun to exploit these advances. Nanotechnology not only promotes the invention of new means and methods for conducting warfare, it also enables novel delivery systems for existing weapons. This panel will discuss the implications of nanotechnology for lasers, electronics, robotics, drones, exoskeletons, toxic nanoparticles, and nanoparticle catalysts. The panel will also discuss the ethical implications of endowing human actors with the attributes of robots. For example, is it ethical to use nanotechnology to remove human actors (servicemembers) from the employment of lethal force? Is it ethical to use unwitting civilians to deliver toxic nanoparticles to a specific target? Does it matter that the civilians are not impacted by the toxin, only the target? Is it proper, through nanotechnology, to mask the identity of the actor/combatant? If nanotechnology diminishes attribution, what impact will this have on the notion of self-defense?
Moderator: Professor Mitt Regan, McDevitt Professor of Jurisprudence, Director of the Center on the Legal Profession, and Co-Director on the Center on National Security and the Law at Georgetown University Law Center
Professor Margaret Kosal, Associate Professor, Georgia Institute of Technology
LTC Christopher Korpela, Associate Professor and Director of the Robotics Research Center at the United States Military Academy at West Point
Mr. Louis Del Monte, CEO of Del Monte & Associates, Inc.
September 26, 2019
A Warfighter’s Perspective on the Challenge of Future Weaponry
Location: Fitts Auditorium, University of Pennsylvania Law School
GEN. (RET) JOSEPH VOTEL
FORMER COMMANDER, UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND
“A Warfighter’s Perspective on the Challenge of Future Weaponry”
Followed by a Q & A Moderated by Professor Claire Finkelstein,
CERL Faculty Director and Algernon Biddle Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy
This program has been approved for 1.5 ethics CLE credits for Pennsylvania lawyers. CLE credit may be available in other jurisdictions as well. Attendees seeking CLE credit should bring separate payment in the amount of $60.00 ($30.00 public interest/non-profit attorneys) cash or check made payable to The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania.
General Counsel, United States Air Force
Director of Research, U.S. Naval Academy’s Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership
Professor of Cyber Law at the College of Information and Cyberspace, National Defense University
Director of the Innovation Laboratory at Beyond Conflict
CEO of Del Monte & Associates, Inc.
CERL Founder & Faculty Director; Algernon Biddle Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania
Professor of Law, Ave Maria School of Law
Associate Professor in the Department of Environmental Health and Engineering at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Professor of Political Science and the Associate Director of Perry World House at the University of Pennsylvania
Fellow, Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School
Research Assistant Professor, the Assistant Director of the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at George Mason University
Associate Professor and Director of the Robotics Research Center at the United States Military Academy at West Point
Associate Professor, Georgia Institute of Technology
Department Chair and Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown
Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, of History and Sociology of Science, and of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania
McDevitt Professor of Jurisprudence, Director of the Center on the Legal Profession, and Co-Director on the Center on National Security and the Law at Georgetown University Law Center
Paul Whitfield Horn Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Biodefense, Law and Public Policy,Texas Tech School of Law
Former Commander, United States Central Command, United States Army
Panel 1: Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence (AI)
- “Executive Order on Maintaining American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence.” The White House, The United States Government, www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-maintaining-american-leadership-artificial-intelligence/.
- “Summary of the 2018 Department Of Defense Artificial Intelligence Strategy.” DSIAC, www.dsiac.org/resources/news/summary-2018-department-defense-artificial-intelligence-strategy.
- United States, Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. “U.S. Leadership in AI: A Plan for Federal Engagement in Developing Technical Standards and Related Tools,” 10 Aug. 2019. www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2019/08/10/ai_standards_fedengagement_plan_9aug2019.pdf
- DoD Directive 3000.09, “Autonomy in Weapons Systems,” November 21, 2012, as amended, https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodd/300009p.pdf
- Andrews, Jonathan. “The AIM Initiative: A Strategy for Augmenting Intelligence Using Machines.” Home, www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/item/1940-the-aim-initiative-a-strategy-for-augmenting-intelligence-using-machines?tmpl=component&print=1.
- Brundage, Miles, et al. “The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation.” ArXiv.org, 20 Feb. 2018, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07228.
- Henry A. Kissinger, Eric Schmidt. “The Metamorphosis.” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 11 July 2019, www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/08/henry-kissinger-the-metamorphosis-ai/592771/.
- Report of the Attorney General’s Cyber Digital Task Force. United States Department of Justice, 2 July 2018, www.justice.gov/ag/page/file/1076696/download.
- Tucker, Patrick. “Military Scientists Harness AI To Fight Synthetic Opioids.” Defense One, 21 Aug. 2019, www.defenseone.com/technology/2019/08/military-scientists-harness-ai-fight-synthetic-opioids/159331/.
- Sayler, Kelley M. “Artificial Intelligence and National Security: A Congressional Research Service Report.” R45178, 30 Jan. 2019, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R45178.
- Strout, Nathan. “How the Pentagon Is Tackling Deepfakes as a National Security Problem.” C4ISRNET, C4ISRNET, 29 Aug. 2019, www.c4isrnet.com/information-warfare/2019/08/29/how-the-pentagon-is-tackling-deepfakes-as-a-national-security-problem/.
- Lopez, C. Todd. “DOD Seeks Ethicist to Guide Deployment of Artificial Intelligence.” U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, 3 Sept. 2019, www.defense.gov/explore/story/Article/1950724/dod-seeks-ethicist-to-guide-deployment-of-artificial-intelligence/source/GovDelivery/.
Panel 2: Biological and Chemical Convergence
- Tucker, Jonathan B. Innovation, Dual Use, and Security: Managing the Risks of Emerging Biological and Chemical Technologies. MIT Press, 2012.
- Kania, Elsa B., and Wilson VornDick. “Weaponizing Biotech: How China’s Military Is Preparing for a ‘New Domain of Warfare’.” Defense One, 14 Aug. 2019, www.defenseone.com/ideas/2019/08/chinas-military-pursuing-biotech/159167/.
- Cervenka, Susanne. “Lyme Disease as War Weapon? Rep. Chris Smith’s Push for Probe Advances after Call for Trump to Investigate.” Asbury Park Press, Asbury Park Press, 17 July 2019, www.app.com/story/news/health/2019/07/16/lyme-disease-bioweapon-rep-chris-smiths-call-probe-advances/1735651001/.
- National Biodefense Strategy. https://fas.org/irp/threat/cbw/biodef-strat.pdf
- Tucker, Jonathan B. “The Convergence of Biology and Chemistry: Implications for Arms Control Verification – Jonathan B. Tucker, 2010.” SAGE Journals, 3 Nov. 2016, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0096340210387050
- “Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.” OPCW, www.opcw.org/.
- Willman, David. “Trump Administration Gutted Anti-Terrorism Programs. Bipartisan Officials Want an Explanation.” Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles Times, 5 Sept. 2019, www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-09-05/bipartisan-congressional-officials-trump-administration-cuts-anti-wmd-terrorism
- Sutton, Victoria. “Emerging Biotechnologies and the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention: Can it Keep Up with the Biotechnology Revolution?” (2015), https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1083&context=lawreview
Panel 3: Biological Enhancements and Genetics
- Greene, Marsha, and Zubin Master. “Ethical Issues of Using CRISPR Technologies for Research on Military Enhancement.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, vol. 15, no. 3, 2018, pp. 327–335., doi:10.1007/s11673-018-9865-6.
- “What Is CRISPR-Cas9?” Facts, The Public Engagement Team at the Wellcome Genome Campus, 19 Dec. 2016, www.yourgenome.org/facts/what-is-crispr-cas9.
- Doudna, Jennifer A., and Samuel H. Sternberg. A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution. Mariner Books, 2018.
- Bidshahri, Raya. “The Power to Upgrade Our Own Biology Is in Sight-But Is Society Ready for Human Enhancement?” Singularity Hub, 26 Apr. 2019, https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/15/the-power-to-upgrade-our-biology-and-the-ethics-of-human-enhancement/
- KRISHNAN, ARMIN. Military Neuroscience and the Coming Age of Neurowarfare. ROUTLEDGE, 2018.
- Jesse Kirkpatrick, Editing Biosecurity
Panel 4: Nanotechnology
- Chandler, David L., and MIT News Office. “New Nanoparticle Catalysts Could Reduce Need for Precious Metals.” MIT News, 19 May 2016, news.mit.edu/2016/new-nanoparticle-catalysts-could-reduce-need-precious-metals-0519.
- Monte, Louis A. Del. “Are Nanoweapons Paving the Road to Human Extinction?” HuffPost, HuffPost, 3 June 2017, www.huffpost.com/entry/are-nanoweapons-paving-the-road-to-human-extinction_b_59332a52e4b00573ab57a3fe.
- “National Nanotechnology Initiative.” Nano. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Aug. 2019. https://www.nano.gov/
- Daniels, Jeff. “Mini-Nukes and Mosquito-like Robot Weapons Being Primed for Future Warfare.” CNBC, CNBC, 18 Mar. 2017, www.cnbc.com/2017/03/17/mini-nukes-and-inspect-bot-weapons-being-primed-for-future-warfare.html.
- Sutton, Victoria. “Military Technologies, Nanotechnology and Law: Using Nano-Science Fiction as an Analytical Tool” (July 2012), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2103339
Technology in General
- “Are You Ready for the Technological Revolution?” https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/02/are-you-ready-for-the-technological-revolution/
- Eric T. Jensen, The Future of the Law of Armed Conflict: Ostriches, Butterflies, and Nanobots , 35 Mich. J. Int’l L. 253 (2014). Available at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol35/iss2/3
- Boffey, Daniel. “Robot, Heal Thyself: Scientists Develop Self-Repairing Machines.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 7 Aug. 2019, www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/aug/07/robot-heal-thyself-scientists-develop-self-repairing-machines.
- “US Army.” Fox News, FOX News Network, www.foxnews.com/category/tech/topics/us-army.
- Sutton, Victoria. “A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Ethic of Biodefense and Bioterrorism” 33 J.L. Med. & Ethics 310, 2005, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2122590
For any questions regarding the conference or registration, please contact: Jennifer Cohen at email@example.com